A lot of the trips I remember - from my teenage years before I left to get an education - start with my dad coming back from some trip to the wilds of Utah, excited because he learned about some new place to find rocks. Not too long before I left rural Utah to get an education, it happened again. My dad had been deer hunting with his friends in the foothills above "The Park". It wasn't long before I found myself enlisted as a pack mule hauling these rocks up the steep shale hills in the Park.
My dad had stumbled across a deposit of rocks that I believe are totally unique. Only my dad, and maybe a paleontologist, would have stopped long enough to notice them. And similarly, only my dad, and maybe a paleontologist, would have understood what he was looking at. Maybe not a paleontologist. I haven't found one yet who does. It appears to me that most people immediately fall into the trap of thinking, "Oh Ja! I know what that is!"
But they don't.
The Park is the local name for a long, gentle valley that stretches from Soldier Summit in the west to the top of Nine Mile Canyon in the east. The north side advances through increasingly higher foothills until it fades into the Uinta Basin and eventually the Uinta Mountains. Every other range of mountains in the West run north and south. The Uinta Mountains run east and west.
Part of the problem is that there are well known rocks that look a little bit like my Algae-on-a-Stick found not far from where my dad discovered them. 58 to 66 million years ago, the whole area was a fresh water lake called Lake Flagstaff. One of the rocks found in that formation is called "Birdseye Marble". A rockhounding site says this about it.
This lake deposited a sequence of sediments that formed rocks known as the Flagstaff Formation. Although these rocks are technically a limestone, the building stone industry has termed this deposit a "marble." The rocks are rich in algal ball structures commonly known as "birdseyes."
Here's the geological definition of an oncolite (Wikipedia):
Oncolites are sedimentary structures composed of oncoids, which are layered structures formed by cyanobacterial growth. Oncolites are very similar to Stromatolites, but, instead of forming columns, they form approximately spherical structures. The oncoids often form around a central nucleus, such as a shell fragment, and a calcium carbonate structure is deposited by encrusting microbes.
My fossil is clearly a column, not a sphere. Oncolites are typically much smaller - "with an average size of less than one inch" according to worldatlas.com. Mine are usually at least ten times larger. One thing is certain. My dad's A-o-a-S fossils are not oncolites!
One way to see the difference is another unique feature of A-o-a-S: the globular structure of the outer layer. Just looking at it, it's easy to see the similarity with living organisms commonly found in swamps today. What you can see today is real "algae on a stick". I've seen lots of swamps and shallow lakes with sticks and reeds encrusted with green goo sticking out of the water. They look exactly like these rocks ... except that they are living, green plants. These green gobs didn't form in layers with the gradual deposition of calcium by cyanobacteria over long periods of geological time. They formed in just a few years in a swamp. My fossils look like brown versions of the same thing except that they are rock.
If my "Algae-on-a-Stick" fossils didn't form as oncolites, how did they form? A living green mass on the outside of a stick is fragile and normally couldn't be turned into a piece of agate. Since oncolites form gradually over time, the outer layer is quite different and it doesn't form along the length of sticks and reeds. Column shaped stromatolite fossils also exist, but they are the result of gradual growth on the top surface of a cyanobacteria mass. Living stromatolites can be found in Australia and Utah.
The reason you find "dinosaur bone" silicified fossils instead of whole fossilized dinosaur flesh is that only the bone is durable enough to survive being buried and turned into stone. (Very fragmentary samples of actual fossilized dinosaurs have been found and they are the crown jewels of the paleontology world.)
Blue Forest wood from Eden Valley in Wyoming is an exception. It is often covered with fossilized algae, but it's compressed and looks like a layer of dirt. (Until you try to scrape it off. Then you realize that it's part of the fossil.) The outer layer of Blue Forest wood was also deposited on a stick in just a few months or years too. And Blue Forest is also noted for the detailed and accurate replacement of the wood, except that my A-o-a-S is even more detailed and accurate. So, the way Blue Forest wood was formed is similar, but not the same.
I have an idea about how A-o-a-S formed and I'd like a paleontologist to give it serious consideration.
The Burgess Shale fossils are replaced soft-bodied creatures from the Cambrian - almost ten times older than my fossils. Fossils like the ones from the Burgess Shale are found in only a few places in the world. The Canadian Rockies and China are the only places I know of. Scientists believe that the soft Burgess Shale organisms managed to be preserved as fossils due to a unique geological event that initially buried them. Scientists believe that something that might be called a gentle underwater landslide occurred and living creatures were very gently covered with fine silt drifting down through still water - so fine and gentle that the creatures were left whole and perfect. An event like that could have preserved my dad's A-o-a-S too. (Blue Forest wood was flooded, exposed, and then buried in a much more violent way which accounts for the difference.)
I tell everyone that "I'm not a great rockhound. That was my dad." He wasn't a paleontologist either. I have sent out a few, very few, of my dad's A-o-a-S. I can't afford to subscribe to the academic journals that might have more clues, but I was able to acquire a PDF written by a scientist, Malcolm Weiss. who has documented similar looking fossils that are also associated with ancient Lake Flagstaff in “Oncolites, Paleoecology, and Laramide Tectonics, Central Utah” (The American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, V. 63, No. 5, May, 1969). The fossils documented in this paper are much smaller and less well preserved, but they make the point that roughly similar fossils exist, even though they might have been created differently. Familiarity of oncolites in geology may have caused Weiss to identify his fossils that way, especially since the poor replacement forces a best guess instead of a definite conclusion.
The information I have been able to find has led me to believe that these fossils were in the Cove River Member of the Flagstaff Formation in Central Utah. I can't afford to subscribe to the academic journals that might have more clues, but I was able to acquire a PDF written by a scientist, Malcolm Weiss. who has documented similar fossils that are also associated with ancient Lake Flagstaff in “Oncolites, Paleoecology, and Laramide Tectonics, Central Utah” (The American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, V. 63, No. 5, May, 1969). The fossils documented in this paper are much smaller and less well preserved, but they make the point that such fossils exist to people who might be able to help. Every one I have sent out has been with the hope of finding somebody who would take them seriously. But so far, it has been a mission of futility.
There's a legendary story in geology like this. The most revolutionary and important new idea in geology is "Plate Tectonics". It was originally discovered and proposed by a meteorologist named Alfred Wegener. Scorn and ridicule was heaped on Wegener during his life. "What a stupid idea to think that the whole surface of the Earth is floating around on magma like wood chips on molasses. And the guy isn't even a geologist! He's a glorified weatherman!"
I don't claim to be a Wegener or a geologist. I was only lucky enough to inherit these rocks from a great rockhound: my dad. But they deserve serious consideration and I'm going to keep working to get it for them.
Hey, I found your page! I would love some of that super 7 😍 I love your website! Very informative and you have some amazing rocks. I would love to buy a thunder egg as well ❤
Fun! My favorite category of rock is probably fossilized/agatized 'stuff': wood, bone, coral, organisms, minerals, etc. I am no expert, but it is so interesting to see remnants of the past and to think about the long history of Earth. Not to mention, the interesting colors and formations that can occur in the mineralization process.
I'm one of the lucky few to have one of your algae-on-a-stick. :) It's such a cool piece. Still searching for someone knowledgeable to look at it, cause I have no clue!